![]() |
Quote:
|
The 91'-01' VFR is a bike I would love to have. They are a little heavy and a little under powered, but the personality and sound of the engine is a keeper. All anyone wanted was more power. Instead, they lose the gear drive (sad) add the V-Tec. That sucked and now this..thing.
Hey maybe this bike and that scooter thing are just a set up for a forth coming VFR1000RR sport bike. Yeah, that must be it, because they gotta know these things won't sell. |
The V Tech VFRs didnt sell either. There are leftovers everywhere. Honda just builds what they want to build, and you better like it or else. Review it badly they'll pull their ad money...
|
Already have some guys on a vfr board be able to test ride one. They said the added weight isn't felt with the added power. It handles just fine.
I'm not sure where people are getting, "handles like shit" from. 1. They haven't ridden it. 2. Everyone was "O snap" when they saw the goldwing dragon vids. So I'm still confused on where the shit is coming from. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
So what hidden message is really in the new vfr? http://www.vfrdiscussion.com/forum/i...howtopic=55214 |
People have become so jaded. Testers and reviewers that have never ridden a V Max or an 80s Z1 decide 'oh its heavy!' 'Oh it doesnt handle!'
I think it probably works fine, it just isnt what the genral public were hoping would come out... |
I actually love the styling, "shamu" looks cool as all hell, just from the stats alone though, i would like to see it loose 150 lbs and expand the gas tank
http://www.asphaltandrubber.com/wp-c...fr1200_022.jpg |
I'm still puzzled on the smaller gas tank. I guess dropping a gallon makes up to counter act the other added weight?
|
Ugh, not that pic again. FAIL on so many levels.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.