Quote:
Originally Posted by Trip
I am against it from that aspect as well, but not against it from an illegal standpoint.
A woman already has that responsibility alone. It's her choice to carry it or not. The man can say nothing about that. This is giving a voice to the man to refuse to take part in what happens after she is done carrying instead of being held hostage.
We are already kicking money into the pot for this reason. Look at your situation where he didn't pay, all the court fees that go along with that. We spend a lot of money on nonpaying biological fathers. Costs would most likely hold steady once you factor in everything or may even be reduced on the public. Would be an interesting study to conduct to see it's impact on financials.
|
You may be kicking in some money but you're advocating a situation in which you would have to increase that by multiples, without legal recourse.
In my situation the government, and hence the people, were out the amount that legal aid cost. Nothing more.