Bye-Bye G8...HELLO Caprice!! - Page 6

Homeslice · 07-20-2009, 04:37 PM

Hell, 14" was considered performance back then. So were 70-profile tires.

Tell you what though, if this was 1982 and I was forced to buy that or the Camaro, I'd pick the former.

pauldun170 · 07-20-2009, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Homeslice

Hell, 14" was considered performance back then. So were 70-profile tires.

Tell you what though, if this was 1982 and I was forced to buy that or the Camaro, I'd pick the former.

2.8V6 and the 4spd and you end up with a semi respectable (for the day) little..

ah shit the brakes just went out

never mind

101lifts2 · 07-21-2009, 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karl_1052

It looks like GM gave a room full of five year olds sugar, and crystal meth, then made them watch Power Rangers for 24 hours straight. Then they showed them a pic of a nice 69 camaro, and asked how they could make it look better. they took a meth break first of course.

Sorry Karl, but you are one of the only ones that said the Camaro looks like shit. To each his own I guess.

karl_1052 · 07-21-2009, 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pauldun170

2.8V6 and the 4spd and you end up with a semi respectable (for the day) little..

ah shit the brakes just went out

never mind

Hell man, that car was the predecessor to the Z24, and we know how popular that car was.

The X-11 rocked(even though, it was a huge pile of crap)

07-20-2009, 04:37 PM	#51
Homeslice Elitist Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: SF Bay Area Moto: Gix 750 Posts: 11,351	Hell, 14" was considered performance back then. So were 70-profile tires. Tell you what though, if this was 1982 and I was forced to buy that or the Camaro, I'd pick the former.