Go Back   Two Wheel Fix > General > Cage Hell

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-07-2008, 06:57 PM   #1
FT BSTRD
Tractor Driver
 
FT BSTRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Franklin, TN
Moto: Buell XB12X Ulysses
Posts: 1,007
Default

If you are looking strictly at the economic component, the hybrids are not yielding viable savings over their working lifetime.

Why they aren't producing diesel hybrids is beyond me. THAT might make some economic sense.

You'd have to keep the car 10 years to make it pay off. That's about 6-7 years beyond the life expectancy of the batteries.

If you were going to keep a car that long, the savings would be in keeping a car that long.

What is the cost savings of keeping a car for 10 years instead of 5?

What are the PRODUCTION savings of keeping a car for 10 years instead of 5?


If someone is serious about being green, don't just buy something that LOOKS green. Think through the entire process of production for cost effectiveness and energy savings.
__________________
"I do get tired of reading,'my buddy is a racer and says the Buell will never work' I always want to say 'Who the F*CK is your buddy and is he faster than Shawn Higbee?"

--Erik Buell


FT BSTRD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2008, 07:10 PM   #2
Mr Lefty
TWFix Legend
 
Mr Lefty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Denver CO
Moto: 01 BMW F650GS Dakar
Posts: 15,677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FT BSTRD View Post
If you are looking strictly at the economic component, the hybrids are not yielding viable savings over their working lifetime.

Why they aren't producing diesel hybrids is beyond me. THAT might make some economic sense.

You'd have to keep the car 10 years to make it pay off. That's about 6-7 years beyond the life expectancy of the batteries.

If you were going to keep a car that long, the savings would be in keeping a car that long.

What is the cost savings of keeping a car for 10 years instead of 5?

What are the PRODUCTION savings of keeping a car for 10 years instead of 5?


If someone is serious about being green, don't just buy something that LOOKS green. Think through the entire process of production for cost effectiveness and energy savings
.
VERY good point...
I wonder... if you take someone who owns a 1975 Chevy pickup (we'll pretend it's running ) with a big gas guzzler motor... and could some how measure the amount of polution and harm done to the enviroment by him... and compare it to someone who's purchased a new vehicle every 4 or 5 years.

Accounting for all the emissions of the plants that created the new vehicles... I think the 75 Chevy might be alot greener than one might normally think.
Mr Lefty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2008, 07:57 PM   #3
FT BSTRD
Tractor Driver
 
FT BSTRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Franklin, TN
Moto: Buell XB12X Ulysses
Posts: 1,007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ebbs15 View Post
VERY good point...
I wonder... if you take someone who owns a 1975 Chevy pickup (we'll pretend it's running ) with a big gas guzzler motor... and could some how measure the amount of polution and harm done to the enviroment by him... and compare it to someone who's purchased a new vehicle every 4 or 5 years.

Accounting for all the emissions of the plants that created the new vehicles... I think the 75 Chevy might be alot greener than one might normally think.

Zactly! NOT buying a new car saves more than buying one that gets better mileage, but there is no money in it for the auto manufacturers.

Think of all the mining for the metals, the smelting of those metals into the alloys used, the machining, the molding, the production of the chemicals that make up all the plastics and synthetics, the chemicals in the batteries, the electricity used in all those processes, the gas burned by all those employees getting to and from work, the ecological cost of all the tooling, the ecological cost of all the travel to all the auto shows, the ecological cost of all the paper for all the marketing materials.


It's staggering. If you bought a car and drove it for 10 years instead of 5, you would do more good for the environment than just about anything else you could do.


Even more than keeping your tires inflated.
__________________
"I do get tired of reading,'my buddy is a racer and says the Buell will never work' I always want to say 'Who the F*CK is your buddy and is he faster than Shawn Higbee?"

--Erik Buell


FT BSTRD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2008, 07:58 PM   #4
Mr Lefty
TWFix Legend
 
Mr Lefty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Denver CO
Moto: 01 BMW F650GS Dakar
Posts: 15,677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FT BSTRD View Post
Zactly! NOT buying a new car saves more than buying one that gets better mileage, but there is no money in it for the auto manufacturers.

Think of all the mining for the metals, the smelting of those metals into the alloys used, the machining, the molding, the production of the chemicals that make up all the plastics and synthetics, the chemicals in the batteries, the electricity used in all those processes, the gas burned by all those employees getting to and from work, the ecological cost of all the tooling, the ecological cost of all the travel to all the auto shows, the ecological cost of all the paper for all the marketing materials.


It's staggering. If you bought a car and drove it for 10 years instead of 5, you would do more good for the environment than just about anything else you could do.


Even more than keeping your tires inflated.
Mr Lefty is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.