Quote:
Originally Posted by fatbuckRTO
Tagging a wall is destruction of property. It costs money to fix that, whether it's a full cleaning or just another can of paint to cover it up. I'm at a loss for the criminal act that was committed here. The best I can come up with was misuse of Wal-mart property, in which case they have grounds to sue, and certainly to ban him from the premises, but an arrest?
Maybe it's something in New Jersey law. Which would not surprise me. Regardless, it seems incredibly excessive and overprotective. Pussification, I believe, is the proper term here...
|
Apparently it damaged something less concrete; Wal-Mart's reputation. I know that some would say that they don't have one worth protecting anyway, but....