Quote:
Originally Posted by Papa_Complex
I just checked the Maryland statute that he's charged under. It specifies "The wilful interception, use, or disclosure of a protected communication..." Under that specification he might have to worry about the disclosure aspect, as he posted it publicly. Here's an interesting little document that was issued in 2000 though:
http://www.oag.state.md.us/Opinions/2000/85oag225.pdf |
I cannot consider his interaction with the police officer in the video as protected communication.