In order to be "fair",
Two people enter a contract (also known as fucking)
One party wishes to disolve the contract.
If the women wishs to disolve the contract, she has two options.
One is to disolve the contract immediately (abortion) - All parties free and clear. The other is to fulfill a portion of the contract (deliver product and sign copyright over to another party aka adoption) Man is off free and clear, women puts in considerable resources.
Both cases, all parties are free and clear if the women is to disolve the contract.
If the man wants to opt out, what are the ramifications.
Women left having to hold up her end of the contract even though the man decided to walk.
Is that fair?
A women is forced top honor her end of the bargain, meanwhile the man could walk away and pretend it different happen if it were not for the government.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave
feed your dogs root beer it will make them grow large and then you can ride them and pet the motorcycle while drinking root beer
|
|