Quote:
Originally Posted by pauldun170
I only hope that they do their job in vetting her as a candidate. I don't want them to treat anyone like they did "the last time" or some stupid revenge or "fuck you" position.
I haven't looked into Kagans record yet and I'm certainly not interested in tit for tat BS from anyone, meaning I will not be wasting time with the media nor politicians tossing bullshit damnation or praise on her.
I know one item they will probably get on her about is her thing with Military recruiters at Harvard. Something about the Military's discriminatory policies against gays leading to her prohibiting them from setting up shop on campus.
|
I didn't mean to imply I wanted anything like that either. I thought the Judiciary Committee dealt with Miers fairly and thoroughly. They were the ones who brought her issues to the forefront and the criticisms came from both Democrats and Republicans.
Her issue with the recruiters is the main thing I have heard so far. I don't know how many other "record" issues there will be. Unless Kagan was giving speeches all the time like Sotomayor there is probably a smaller record to examine than is typical.