Quote:
Originally Posted by Papa_Complex
I would say that a good test case would involve someone stalking and then accosting someone, who is apparently minding his own business while walking through a neighbourhood where he has reason to be.
|
But then he should be charged for instigation/abuse of some kind. The shooting is a separate issue IMO.
Just because he was wrong to instigate, doesn't prove that he was wrong to defend himself. If in fact he feared for his life.
Aren't judges & juries smart enough to consider each issue separately?