squatters rights again

fatbuckRTO · 08-08-2012, 10:05 AM

When I first read about this a few months ago, I thought that maybe the squatting family were just as much victims of this guy Alfonso Carrillo as the Donovans. The more I hear about their actions throughout the case, though, and the more I think about it... screw them. They know exactly what they're doing at this point.

Anybody who tries to use adverse possession these days is pretty much a crook anyway. Property doesn't just sit un-owned anymore. It belongs to a person, a bank, or the taxpayers. Any way you slice it, "adverse possession" is theft.

08-08-2012, 10:05 AM	#7
fatbuckRTO This is not the sig line. Join Date: Dec 2008 Moto: Be prepared. What? Oh, moto... Posts: 1,279	When I first read about this a few months ago, I thought that maybe the squatting family were just as much victims of this guy Alfonso Carrillo as the Donovans. The more I hear about their actions throughout the case, though, and the more I think about it... screw them. They know exactly what they're doing at this point. Anybody who tries to use adverse possession these days is pretty much a crook anyway. Property doesn't just sit un-owned anymore. It belongs to a person, a bank, or the taxpayers. Any way you slice it, "adverse possession" is theft. __________________ This was no time for half measures. He was a captain, godsdammit. An officer. Things like this didn't present a problem for an officer. Officers had a tried and tested way of solving problems like this. It was called a sergeant. -Terry Pratchett, Guards! Guards!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode