wow. local MSF inst. trying to pawn off zx-12r to a new rider

[fasternyou929]

Originally Posted by ebbs15

that's not what he was saying... or at least what I was talking about...

he was saying that a 0 experienc rider on a 600 ss would be more dangerous than a MSF trained person on a 12R...

I don't know if he agrees with it or not... I can see valid points from both sides...

These are the comments I was referring to. Seemed to me he just kept upping the ante to keep an argument going. For argument's sake.

Originally Posted by pickle.of.doom

Why would crashing in a corner on a zx12r be an different than on an r6? The r6 would probably be carrying more corner speed....

Originally Posted by pickle.of.doom

Throttle will kick you off on either bike. The 12r with its extra weight and stability would actually be a better bike to fuck up the braking part on.

Originally Posted by pickle.of.doom

Also, I think in a lot of cases, a 12r IS probably more forgiving than a more modern 600, which is a lot lighter, a lot more high strung, with a shorter wheelbase, as well as a more aggressive rake and trail, brakes that bite a lot more, etc etc.

Regardless of Little Pickle's views, you and I were clearly not on the same page. I agree arguing both sides of a view is beneficial, it's one of the first challenges you are given in a debate class, but I don't agree there's a benefit to making stupid arguments because "this is the internet!".