1975 Kawasaki Triple

[Phenix_Rider]

Originally Posted by '73 H1 Triple

He speaks the truth. Highbars are for show but not for safe riding

"High bars" to me are like the stockers on my 650R. It probably has the stock bars on it still. I'm sure I'd go to superbike bars or clipons, but it's dad's bike, so whatever he's comfortable with. As long as he's safe, fine with me.

[BobTheBiker]

I hate high handlebars. lower ones look and feel much better.


On a side note, I have a friend selling a complete GT750triple motor and some misc parts for one here local to me if anyone is interested in it. I'll even crate it and handle the shipping if you're wanting it enough.

[Dnyce]

if its anything like my kz, you'll probably hate clip ons, but they look sweet. same with the clubman bars.

superbike bars are usually the most comfy, for old dudes and young ones alike from what ive seen-i liked em

[BobTheBiker]

My friend's dad actually has clipons on his 75 RD350, they change the riding position a fair bit over the stock bars. superbike bars are pretty much perfect IMO. My buddy, whose dad has the 75 RD, has a 73 RD 250 of his own, with superbike bars on it that are pretty nice. you can change the riding position by where your ass is on the seat.

on a side note, 2 stroke bikes are SHOCKINGLY light things compared to sportbikes. I rode the 73 RD 250, and kinda forgot there was a bike under me except for the moving and holding a clutch in thing. I think thats a great thing about simpler bikes, they tend to be light.

[was92v]

Originally Posted by BobTheBiker

on a side note, 2 stroke bikes are SHOCKINGLY light things compared to sportbikes. I rode the 73 RD 250, and kinda forgot there was a bike under me except for the moving and holding a clutch in thing. I think thats a great thing about simpler bikes, they tend to be light.

Yeah! What he said...

[Phenix_Rider]

Originally Posted by BobTheBiker

on a side note, 2 stroke bikes are SHOCKINGLY light things compared to sportbikes. I rode the 73 RD 250, and kinda forgot there was a bike under me except for the moving and holding a clutch in thing. I think thats a great thing about simpler bikes, they tend to be light.

From the links, looks like the H1 weighs a bit more than my 650R.

[BobTheBiker]

Good point here, the H1 is a triple, and has a fairly large amount of running gear on it, making it heavier. the RD I rode is literally bare essentials, no fender on the front, minimalist gauges(tach only) and its RETARDEDLY light. something like 250 pounds or so at most, cause me and my buddy can pick it up from each end by ourselves and carry it.

[was92v]

Originally Posted by BobTheBiker

Good point here, the H1 is a triple, and has a fairly large amount of running gear on it, making it heavier. the RD I rode is literally bare essentials, no fender on the front, minimalist gauges(tach only) and its RETARDEDLY light. something like 250 pounds or so at most, cause me and my buddy can pick it up from each end by ourselves and carry it.

The RD250 & 350 weigh in at about 310. Stripped for racing they come in around 285 lb's wet. My Rd's that I raced would make about 50 HP (avg, about 65 when cool). They are small, light and fast. They can make for a pretty exciting ride, but they do require a lot of concentration to ride fast.

['73 H1 Triple]

Originally Posted by Phenix_Rider

WOW- H1, No Worries, thanks for all the info! I just emailed dad the links. I'll let you know when he signs up. We were running errands today and looked a few places for a Haynes or Clymers manual- couldn't find one, but I'll check a few dealers tomorrow.

The guy he's getting it from doesn't seem to know much about it. Good guy, but it sounds like he got some misinformation. He says he cleaned/rebuilt the carbs, and that it was run on the street not too long ago. Problem is, he said it's a four-stroke, and it sounds like the carbs are all out of whack, and the petcock may leak. Unfortunately, I haven't seen the thing firsthand yet. Apparently, the title only says it's a 1975 Kawasaki 500. I've told dad the first thing we need to do is replace the tubes, tires, and brake lines, and rebuild/synch the carbs.

I'm looking forward to riding this thing. It'll mostly be used as a commuter, so that 78mpg sounds great, and the 60hp and 42ft-lbs sounds frightening with skinny tires and old components.

Both the Haynes and the Clymer have some mistakes in them. He can download the Glenn's manual off the resource link. That has both general maintence and performance tips in it. Best book you could buy and you can download it for free.

Where did the 78mpg come from? You'll get 30 or so if your lucky. These were made for mileage, they were made to kick ass.

Originally Posted by Phenix_Rider

"High bars" to me are like the stockers on my 650R. It probably has the stock bars on it still. I'm sure I'd go to superbike bars or clipons, but it's dad's bike, so whatever he's comfortable with. As long as he's safe, fine with me.

Superbike bars are the way to go. Just slightly lower than stock and they help keep the front end down.

Originally Posted by BobTheBiker

I hate high handlebars. lower ones look and feel much better.


On a side note, I have a friend selling a complete GT750triple motor and some misc parts for one here local to me if anyone is interested in it. I'll even crate it and handle the shipping if you're wanting it enough.

If you give a description and some type of contact info, I'll post it up on the triple forum.

Jeff

[Particle Man]

looks like a ton of fun (both to ride and wrench on)