Forget about your kid racing in Florida

[Corey]

Originally Posted by Papa_Complex

If it's a for-profit organization, then it would appear that the ruling already applies. High school football programmes might well be exempt, but this is going to make a lot of people rethink their participation.

Sure, high school programs, but what about pee-wee football and all the other shit, like summer camps, youth leagues, and other stuff along those lines that happen outside of school? Those are for profit and require a legal waiver as well.

[Papa_Complex]

Originally Posted by Corey

Sure, high school programs, but what about pee-wee football and all the other shit, like summer camps, youth leagues, and other stuff along those lines that happen outside of school? Those are for profit and require a legal waiver as well.

That's my point. They're essentially already toast.

[Corey]

Originally Posted by Papa_Complex

That's my point. They're essentially already toast.

I Fucking hate this state. I wish it would break off and sink into the ocean and take everyone with it. There's so many shots taken at shitville and Arkansas for being backwater embarrassments, but Florida has them all beat.

[deals gap dragon slayer]

Originally Posted by Corey

There's so many shots taken at shitville and Arkansas for being backwater embarrassments, but Florida has them all beat.

Why do you think Florida has its own category on Fark.com

[Corey]

Originally Posted by deals gap dragon slayer

Why do you think Florida has its own category on Fark.com

Because they produce the best headlines for all the Farkers and Farkettes.

[azoomm]

Interesting development.

Our standard child waiver is two sided - one side is in [more] plain english and is to be signed by the minor. The other side is more complex and is to be signed by a Parent OR Legal Guardian. It is interesting to me, that a parent wouldn't be able to establish what they believe to be the best interest of the child - could it be that in this case it was a weekend-warrior father, and the child's mother [post divorce] is suing? I mean - it said:

The child’s father had signed a “release and waiver of liability, assumption of risk, and indemnity agreement,” according to the ruling. However a representative of the child’s estate stepped forward and filed a lawsuit for wrongful death against the park’s operators.

So, the father isn't involved with the child's estate? Or, is the father just out money-grubbing after he signed for his child and found a loop-hole?

Certainly a case for me to watch....

[Hondahugger]

Looks like my son won't even be playing high school football next year with the way this is going to trigger other events!

[Papa_Complex]

Originally Posted by azoomm

Interesting development.

Our standard child waiver is two sided - one side is in [more] plain english and is to be signed by the minor. The other side is more complex and is to be signed by a Parent OR Legal Guardian. It is interesting to me, that a parent wouldn't be able to establish what they believe to be the best interest of the child - could it be that in this case it was a weekend-warrior father, and the child's mother [post divorce] is suing? I mean - it said:

So, the father isn't involved with the child's estate? Or, is the father just out money-grubbing after he signed for his child and found a loop-hole?

Certainly a case for me to watch....

I've been wondering if the "representative of the child's estate" was court appointed, or hired by one of the parents. I haven't seen any information in that regard.

[cuttle]

Originally Posted by azoomm

So, the father isn't involved with the child's estate? Or, is the father just out money-grubbing after he signed for his child and found a loop-hole?

Certainly a case for me to watch....

The way I read it, it doesn't even matter if both parents would sign a release...


I think I start a cotton ball trowing league (no running - it's to dangerous)

[Corey]

Originally Posted by cuttle

The way I read it, it doesn't even matter if both parents would sign a release...


I think I start a cotton ball trowing league (no running - it's to dangerous)

Sorry, there's a potential choking hazard, and they frown upon things being thrown at other people. It potentially damages their already fragile self esteem. And there are some kids who are allergic to cotton, so that's a big fat no no.