![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
SFL Expatriate #2
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Moto: CBR1000
Posts: 2,043
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
See? But this is what always gets my "panties" in a twist...why was it okay for you to start on an 929 but every other new rider has to start on a 250? I've heard this so many times. Guys on forums that ride liter bikes that "advise" noobs to get a 250...it just blows my mind! The inherent arrogance! "It was alright for me to start on an 929 but YOU must start on a 250". What made you so exemplary that you could be "allowed" to forgo the "common" wisdom and consensus? You know,back to the OP,I'd much rather start on a smooth,stable 12R,rather than a twitchy,jerky 929!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
SFL Expatriate #2
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Moto: CBR1000
Posts: 2,043
|
Quote:
I rode my 929 and my friends 12R through Deal's Gap and Cherohala Skyway, and there was nothing about the 12R that would make a better beginner bike than my 929 or a 600. THAT's what I've been saying - nothing about everyone starting on a 250. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Moto GP Star
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 14,556
|
What? You're not the douche that was saying that because the seller was a MSF instructor he shouldn't sell his 12R to a noob but should advise him to get a "more appropriate"/"MSF approved" starter bike? Oh my bad,carry on then.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
SFL Expatriate #2
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Moto: CBR1000
Posts: 2,043
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|