![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
I give Squids a bad name
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Fly Over State
Moto: 1996 CBR600 F3 (AKA the Flying Turd)
Posts: 4,742
|
That is true. But with HD aquiring MV Agusta which I guess you could consider a Ducati competitor that maybe Ducati is going on the attack now instead of later. Or go on the attack before the HD bankroll puts MV Agusta more mainstream.
__________________
lifts - R.I.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Ride Naked.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Flat and Straight ND
Moto: 08 BUELL 1125R, 05 SV650S
Posts: 7,916
|
yup, way more B-king ish...
And i would much rather have a Vrod. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Trailer Queen
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 46
|
I would love to see some #'s on that and why they would go after the HD Vrod. Till now the Vmax was the most powerfull production bike built. If this has more power it shouldnt be compaired to already dethroned Vrod.
It should have went for the Vmax. At 197.5 HP and 120ftlb torque.
__________________
2009 Star Vmax 1700 My Sportbike Came with the "Old Man" package
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Trip's Assistant
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Imported from Detroit
Moto: 2009 HD Street Classic
Posts: 12,149
|
Exactly on both counts above.
I would love to see somebody do a nightrod/muscle combo. The muscle rear fender on the nightrod. Thanks for making your sig quote of me rightgous again! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
el diablo de verde
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Howell, MI
Moto: VTR, CBR, DRZSM
Posts: 1,046
|
Its easy to see why they call out the Vrod. Both are long, low, fat tired non-turnable bikes that are meant for the drag strip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
DefenderOfTheBuelliverse
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Parts Unknown
Moto: Buell XB12R
Posts: 18,585
|
Quote:
Exactly. That would be a tough combo. Ever rode one? It handles pretty well...especially for a 240 rear.
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|