Police: Store clerk killed beer thief

[101lifts2]

Originally Posted by Rider

As far as I'm concerned when those assholes stole the beer they gave up their rights as given under the law. The clerk shouldn't go to jail because we have bleeding heart liberal laws that protect criminals.

What rights? To live rights? Yeah right. They didn't show deadly force, therefore deadly force should not be used. This isn't a liberal agenda. It is a protection the government needs to uphold.

[RACER X]

Originally Posted by 101lifts2

It is a protection the government needs to uphold.

protection of thieves?

[101lifts2]

Originally Posted by RACER X

protection of thieves?

Protection of life.

[RACER X]

Originally Posted by 101lifts2

Protection of life.

protection of a thiefs rights? IMO they have no rights

does he have rights if he's an illegal alien thief? just checkin

i bet you believe the crooks has more rights then the victim, it' ok in CA to admit it........

becuase he charged, he's automatically guilty?

Originally Posted by 101lifts2

The power to pardon is more admirable IMO than the power to punish. People are stealing because they usually cannot afford what they are taking, not necessarly because they are intrusively bad people.

remember this was beer, not bread or milk.......he stole cuz he didn't want to pay.....

[Papa_Complex]

Originally Posted by RACER X

protection of a thiefs rights? IMO they have no rights

does he have rights if he's an illegal alien thief? just checkin

becuase he charged, he's automatically guilty?

Comments 1 and 3 are directly at odds.

He has rights. He has rights even if he's an illegal. Those rights involve not being 'guilty' until having been found so, in a court of law.

[RACER X]

Originally Posted by Papa_Complex

Comments 1 and 3 are directly at odds.

He has rights. He has rights even if he's an illegal. Those rights involve not being 'guilty' until having been found so, in a court of law.

in this case it's a dead mans word vs a live one.........so who was right, the live guy automatically.........lol

"He has rights even if he's an illegal" yeah, we see how well thats going here, almost ever officer killed in houston this yrs has been killed by an illegal........yeah!

[Papa_Complex]

Originally Posted by RACER X

in this case it's a dead mans word vs a live one.........so who was right, the live guy automatically.........lol

"He has rights even if he's an illegal" yeah, we see how well thats going here, almost ever officer killed in houston this yrs has been killed by an illegal........yeah!

Yeah, the live guy who saw a need to destroy evidence.

They have the right to a trial after which, if found guilty, they have a right to fry or spend a lifetime behind bars. Those are still rights.

[karl_1052]

Originally Posted by Papa_Complex

Comments 1 and 3 are directly at odds.

He has rights. He has rights even if he's an illegal. Those rights involve not being 'guilty' until having been found so, in a court of law.

Tejas has it's own constitution.

[101lifts2]

Originally Posted by RACER X

protection of a thiefs rights? IMO they have no rights.....

That may be your opinon, but not the majority. Your rights don't go away until you are tried and then imprisioned.