Supreme Court rejects corporate campaign spending limits

[goof2]

Originally Posted by pdog

The majority of that money came from actual people. This gov't is supposed to be of the people, for the people. Corps are not people, no matter what the legal definition.

We know that the majority of the money Obama raised was through private donations because he had to publish his donor list. Would you be likely to vote for a candidate that received $100 million from Shell, Dow Chemical, or Merck? How about Soros Fund Management or Miramax? If companies and candidates want to throw good money after bad that is their choice. Either way it isn't going to buy elections since they are already bought and paid for.