Supreme Court rejects corporate campaign spending limits

[goof2]

Originally Posted by EpyonXero

No, now the opposing candidate will have to find his own corporate sponsorship to compete.

That too, but that in no way prevents them from calling in to question their opponent's motives for accepting however much from whatever company. I don't care what the amount is, how much of a chance does a candidate have if they accept large sums from Haliburton, Citgo, and Blackwater (now Xe)? In most areas of the country the answer is not much of one. The money itself is a form of speech, but the source of the money also makes a statement.