![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Follower
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,549
|
How's that working out so far?
__________________
Racing For Smiles |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
What, the minor little 2-3% drop since we last discussed this? Not a big deal to me. My retirement fund's allocation of stocks is still below what is recommended for my target retirement date. I'm just moving a little back into stocks here and there as the market goes down. Might move a little more today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Follower
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,549
|
Quote:
__________________
Racing For Smiles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Follower
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,549
|
Quote:
When this thread was started the market opened at 10,862.22 If a 6.2% loss has improved your return, your choices really are shit.
__________________
Racing For Smiles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
You mean compared to the 82-83% that's supposed to be in stocks if I was using my "target retirement date fund", versus the only ~70% I've got in stocks right now? Yeah, I'm ahead. That particular fund is down more YTD than I am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
AMA Supersport
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4,756
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
Quote:
Last edited by Homeslice; 05-20-2010 at 03:03 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Follower
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 5,549
|
Quote:
A solid asset allocation can often do better over time than the one-stop-shop age-based / target date models. I was just busting your chops on your market timing prowess btw.
__________________
Racing For Smiles |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|