![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Elitist
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Moto: Gix 750
Posts: 11,351
|
Except those efficiencies are very minor, since the manufacturer doesn't own the dealer, and only helps him with a teeny bit of his expenses.
Oh yeah...here is where you said that: |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Serious Business
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: New York
Moto: 1993 ZX-11 2008 CBR1000rr
Posts: 9,723
|
Quote:
My point is that the government helping Automakers get around all the legal bullshit concerning dealers in was assisting automakers in restructuring efforts. The point of those restructuring efforts is to help automaker shed legacy bs and focus on selling cars. Not focus on retail jobs, the focus of the original article. Reread my posts and hopefully you will see that. Dealerships purchase the franchise rights and represent the automaker in the market place. It is the right of the automaker to control that arrangement. My perspective on dealer saturation is from an economist standpoint. Are you going to standby your assertion that consumers cross-shop between GM products and Toyota products? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|