US Judge rules Muslims have a right to assault people who offend them

[Papa_Complex]

Originally Posted by pauldun170

Murder vs manslaughter vs manslaughter in 2nd degree etc etc.

Any way that you slice it, it still sounds like assault to me. The descriptive words used are the same as for assault. Seems like a needless distinction in law, to me.

Originally Posted by pauldun170

Correct me if I'm wrong but the witness testimony was from the police officer who did not witness the alleged altercation.

You're wrong. The witness, that I'm speaking of, was the Zombie Pope, who is the person that the victim was asking to help him during the incident. He saw the whole thing. When a judge throws out evidence (video) and discounts an eye witness, without reason, he creates correctable error. if this had been the other way around, with it being a defence witness and evidence, it would be cause for appeal.

[pauldun170]

Originally Posted by Papa_Complex

Any way that you slice it, it still sounds like assault to me. The descriptive words used are the same as for assault. Seems like a needless distinction in law, to me.



You're wrong. The witness, that I'm speaking of, was the Zombie Pope, who is the person that the victim was asking to help him during the incident. He saw the whole thing. When a judge throws out evidence (video) and discounts an eye witness, without reason, he creates correctable error. if this had been the other way around, with it being a defence witness and evidence, it would be cause for appeal.

Good thing we aren't on a jury together.
We'd drive the other jurors and each other crazy.

[Papa_Complex]

Originally Posted by pauldun170

Good thing we aren't on a jury together.
We'd drive the other jurors and each other crazy.

I figure that my way out of jury duty, is to just let drop that I'm the moderator of the Law and Highway Traffic Act section, on my local board.