![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Resident Droog
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern burbs, Atlanta
Moto: 625 SMC, '08 Tuono R
Posts: 471
|
I'm not sure where all the "price cutting" talk came from. In terms of value, MV's are priced better than HD's. For the same amount of money, you can get either a Brutale 910 or a Fat Bob. One has ~140 hp, weighs ~420 lbs., and has modern suspension. The other doesn't even list hp, only torque, weighs over 700 lbs., and has the same suspension as my 1986 Yamaha Radian. Guess which one is which. Granted, HD may resource parts or restructure current business arrangements, but don't expect any of that to filter down to the end user.
A lot of folks (including myself) will slam HD for their designs, and lack of modernization. However, they know how to run their business. I have no fear that the MV brand will be tainted in any way. If anything, HD's financial stability will help MV stay a low volume, high end bike maker. In the long run, MV fans will be glad that HD took over and allowed MV's to still roll onto the street.
__________________
I'm sick and tired of being bored. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Ride Like an Asshole
Join Date: Feb 2008
Moto: nothing...
Posts: 11,254
|
Quote:
All depends on your definition of value. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Resident Droog
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northern burbs, Atlanta
Moto: 625 SMC, '08 Tuono R
Posts: 471
|
I'll grant you that. No one in the market for an HD would even consider the MV, and visa versa. But you'll have to give me that for two comparatively priced machines, there is no way in 17 hells that it costs as much to build the HD as it does the MV. As we are all aware, the HD badge has a value in itself to some folks. Just not me.
__________________
I'm sick and tired of being bored. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|