CA wants to smog check motorcycles

[azoomm]

Originally Posted by Homeslice

Here's my take on this. You say motorcycles account for a trivial percentage of total pollution, and I agree. But we still prosecute shoplifters even though what they steal represents a trival percentage of all stolen goods, right?

OK, let's get this straight... I didn't say anything. The ARB did.

I simply owned pdog with the data he was freaking out over. That is, if he would actually READ the reports behind what the media is spewing rather than just throwing it up on a page and striking an uneducated view.

I care a LOT about the environment, and do what I can to offset the HUGE footprint I have on this planet (with my business, and all). There are so many other places to work on FIRST that are easier and more effective than a catalytic converter on a motorcycle. And, I don't recall anyone saying that they actually would or wouldn't take one off... other than pdog. Most of us here don't own a bike that had/has one.

THAT is my point.

Why are you running around digging up drama, anyway

[Homeslice]

Originally Posted by azoomm

Most of us here don't own a bike that had/has one.:

Really? None of you have a new bike? As far as I know, ALL new sportbikes, even outside CA, have cats..........someone correct me if I'm wrong.

Originally Posted by azoomm

Why are you running around digging up drama, anyway :

Cuz it's fun.......and because you fuckers keep throwing up 10-page threads before I ever get a chance to post.

[azoomm]

Originally Posted by pdog

Lies, damn lies and statistics.

Let's wrap up this discussion: Kids, be nice and keep the CC on your bike if possible, mmmkay?

Awesome. So, we can move back to the other topic then about you not breeding?

Next time, if you're going to preach to me - you best read the actual numbers you're going to spout.

[pdog]

I believe your graph is wrong, I've already explained why. Sounds like you are getting just as holy-as-thou. Pot, meet kettle.

Originally Posted by azoomm

Next time, if you're going to preach to me - you best read the actual numbers you're going to spout.

[neebelung]

Originally Posted by pdog

I believe your graph is wrong, I've already explained why. Sounds like you are getting just as holy-as-thou. Pot, meet kettle.

*ahem* Hi! I'm Nee... I'm the one who called you holier-than-thou. Sorry, I realize it's easy to confuse Zoomie and I (after all, we're both brilliant, talented, and have excellent taste in bikes). However, just for clarification, we are two different people, K? Thanks!

[pdog]

Preach = holier-than-thou, k? Someone who preaches is generally considered to be holier-than-thou.

Originally Posted by neebelung

*ahem* Hi! I'm Nee... I'm the one who called you holier-than-thou. Sorry, I realize it's easy to confuse Zoomie and I (after all, we're both brilliant, talented, and have excellent taste in bikes). However, just for clarification, we are two different people, K? Thanks!

[neebelung]

Originally Posted by pdog

Preach = holier-than-thou, k? Someone who preaches is generally considered to be holier-than-thou.

Oh well maybe that would've been clearer if anyone besides YOU was preaching in this thread.

[azoomm]

Originally Posted by pdog

I believe your graph is wrong, I've already explained why. Sounds like you are getting just as holy-as-thou. Pot, meet kettle.

It's not MY graph.

[pdog]

Pardon me, Your interpretation of their graph.

Originally Posted by azoomm

It's not MY graph.

[pdog]

I love Internet forums. Just wondering at this point when Godwin's Law will be invoked.